No i do, since you cant see the value of men as people. Because you think like a heartless computer based on your own concept of fact. Because you think only in terms of physical ability. It is sad and I feel bad for the torture your life must be to live with such a heart
Damn straight it wouldn't.
we'd kill each other from lack of sex.
not having sex drives men insane.
so since both ways causes the society to collapse or fall into chaos and war, i say we leave it at "Men and women work together."
because with Men around, women dont have to talk to other women if they dont want to. and with women around men will at least have some opportunity to get laid.
though the ones that dont get laid will still go insane and try to blow * up.
I honestly think there's too much of this "Modern feminism" BS saying how women deserve more of this and that and blah blah blah. I think when people start to get even they want to have so much more. So the "Men and Women work together" is the best idea, but it's going to be hard so we'll just have to press towards that the best we could! ^^
everything is a knowledge contest lately *rolls eyes*
but i honestly think men and women wouldn't be able to live without each other...because we're not just genes and chemicals and stuff. we have feelings and emotional needs...at least straight ppl would need someone from the other gender to fullfill their necessities
i'm not just talking about sex, remember this pyramid?
one of the basic necessities? sex...if you're a straight person, you'd need someone from the opposite gender so you could satisfy this necessity
safety an security next...well err...safety comes in numbers XD so have a huge family ppl, you need someone from the other gender! XD (being silly, since i wasn't planning on using this ...)
third step, love and belonging. you love your family, yes, you belong to it too...group of friends, co-workers, perhaps a boy/girl friend? a lover? a wife, husband? they help you fulfill this necessity too ^^
even though there could be a time when either females or males wouldn't be needed anymore and dissappear, it's not very likely, since they need each other...
that's just my opinion based on maslow's hierarchy XD remember guys, we're not just chemical reactions and genes, we have feelings and emotions
You eminate not only beauty, but a distinct knowledge of the inner workings of the mind, that even the greatest scholars on earth would be envious of. You walk on the water of life on the shoes of perfection and cast aside the sheer idiocity of the masses of inferiority
Do you like Japanese stuff, no matter how insane? Then join Sakura no Ai ^^ throw me a PM and I'll gladly add you ^_~
according to maslow it can't
that is if you mean you can satisfy your self esteem necessities without having satisfied the physiological ones first, that's why it's a pyramid, you have to step over the first levels to get to the first one
You eminate not only beauty, but a distinct knowledge of the inner workings of the mind, that even the greatest scholars on earth would be envious of. You walk on the water of life on the shoes of perfection and cast aside the sheer idiocity of the masses of inferiority
Do you like Japanese stuff, no matter how insane? Then join Sakura no Ai ^^ throw me a PM and I'll gladly add you ^_~
Though seriously if Im out walking around in the night to ASDA with the pedo/rapist/murderer/psycho of questionable sanity vampy....who do I have to be afraid of? XD
Kuro Ryu wrote:
A warlock? Arc? ... I've heard weirder things about you to be fair actually XD
I honestly think there's too much of this "Modern feminism" BS saying how women deserve more of this and that and blah blah blah. I think when people start to get even they want to have so much more. So the "Men and Women work together" is the best idea, but it's going to be hard so we'll just have to press towards that the best we could! ^^
ok um... what... the... hell? That is a HUGE jump from
Lucky Star wrote:
I meant genetically weak since it's quite clear that girls are genetically superior to boys based on the XX vs. XY.
It's the Y's fault...
Lucky Star wrote:
It is fact since the Y is inferior compared to the X and that boys have a XY and girls have an XX...
It is known that a dominant X gene can cover some of the "bad traits" (such as colour blindness, early hair loss, some desieses that are passed etc.) on the other X if it is there. However, the Y doesn't appear to be able to do so (it contains very few genes that are often recessive), so boys tend to be more vulnerable than girls to a lot of bad conditions. That's why I said that girls are genetically surpirior to boys.
Lucky Star wrote:
So my point in rejecting men in 2100 and not today is that you will have the technology that covers a lot at that time.
What I'm saying is that men won't be of too much use in the future.
THAT!
Something seriously doesn't add up... I just spent the last couple pages trying to get you to see
Lucky Star wrote:
I honestly think there's too much of this "Modern feminism" BS saying how women deserve more of this and that and blah blah blah. I think when people start to get even they want to have so much more. So the "Men and Women work together" is the best idea, but it's going to be hard so we'll just have to press towards that the best we could! ^^
this!
I was all pissed because of your wrongly placed feminist views! I was driving me up the Fing wall and now all the sudden men arn't so bad? I had to read everything to make sure I wasn't crazy and you actually said all the above! I don't even know what to make of all this.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
<from me
<from rukie
< from shandy
